Q Directions: 1. Journal Entries should be around 2 double-spaced pages (please do NOT include multiple heading lines, (i.e. using ¼ of the page to list the class, your name, the date, the journal entry title, etc.) 2. Journal entries should follow standard paper guidelines, including the use of paragraphs, proper grammar, correct sentence structure, etc. 3. Please carefully proofread your responses. 4. Use APA citations as appropriate This entry should describe your active efforts to improve on the chosen skill you described in Journal Entry #2. Be specific and include an assessment of how well you accomplished your objectives. Be sure to include both successes and setbacks and suggest reasons why you might have been more or less successful in the situation. Describe some specific next steps / plans to continue improving on this particular interpersonal communication skill, or plans to work on an additional skill. Rubric Interpersonal Journal Rubric 4/4 Interpersonal Journal Rubric 4/4 Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence of thought/self-reflection The journal entry clearly shows that the student put time and effort into thinking about the writing prompt, reflecting on themselves, and responding appropriately. 4 pts Excellent Excellent work, it is clear that the author put time and effort into the assignment. 3.67 pts Very Good Very strong work, the author put time and effort into the writing prompt. There are some minor areas for improvement. 3.4 pts Good An above-average response. The author has put some time and effort into the self-reflection exercise but the reaction leaves room for more depth or discussion. 3.13 pts Average The author shows some self-reflection and thought but a greater level of detail and discussion is warranted. 0 pts No Marks 4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePlan Evaluation The journal entry clearly referenced the plan developed in Journal Entry #2, touched on successes and setbacks, and provided suggestions for next steps or plans to work on an additional skill. 4 pts Excellent Excellent Work, the journal entry fully addresses all elements of the writing prompt in a thoughtful manner. 3.67 pts Very Good Very strong work, the author has addressed the varied components of the writing prompt, but some minor areas could be expanded upon. 3.4 pts Good An above-average response. Generally, the author has either touched on all components lightly or has provided depth to some parts of the prompt while overlooking others. 3.13 pts Average The author has addressed some components of the prompt but overall the reaction paper lacks depth or significant elements are missing. 0 pts No Marks 4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics The journal entry is free of typos, misspellings, grammatical errors and/or other structural problems. Highlighted areas typically indicate writing mechanics issues. 2 pts Excellent The journal entry is free of typos, misspellings, grammatical errors and/or other structural problems. 1.85 pts Very Good The journal entry contains no more than three typos, misspellings, grammatical errors and/or other structural problems. 1.7 pts Above Average The journal entry contains more than three typos, misspellings, grammatical errors, etc. and additional editing is needed. 1.56 pts Poor The journal entry contains numerous technical, structural and/or grammatical mistakes and has clearly not been proofread. 0 pts No Marks 2 pts Total Points: 10